The main objective of this task is to gain a deeper understanding of the key group of individuals actively involved in submitting proposals to the Arbitrum governance forum. The hypothesis suggests that there might be a certain group of individuals with shared interests who consistently support each other's proposals, potentially leading to a bias in decision-making and centralization of power.

By conducting a thorough analysis of user interactions, sentiment dynamics, and engagement patterns, the aim is to uncover any signs of collusion and assess its impact on governance processes.

Tally Proposal Post on Forum - Sentiment Analysis & Statistical Analysis

This subtask involved conducting sentiment and statistical analyses on Tally proposal posts within the Arbitrum governance forum. Tally proposals play a crucial role in governance decisions, making it essential to understand the sentiment dynamics surrounding these proposals.

Link to contribution -

https://green-total-quail-829.mypinata.cloud/ipfs/QmT6isjVMs9q4DRJePtUm64qRDEh6u2T6XuEonvLbyyGuw